PediaStaff recently contacted me and asked me to write an opinion piece on cursive handwriting in response to this article in the New York Times. I was happy to do so!
Keeping Cursive Alive
When my 12-year-old daughter left for summer camp, I slipped some stationary into her suitcase and asked her to write me while she was away. I checked the mailbox regularly, looking forward to a letter, but to my dismay, she never wrote. Once she was home, I asked her why she never wrote.
Keeping Cursive Alive
When my 12-year-old daughter left for summer camp, I slipped some stationary into her suitcase and asked her to write me while she was away. I checked the mailbox regularly, looking forward to a letter, but to my dismay, she never wrote. Once she was home, I asked her why she never wrote.
“It takes
too long to write a letter. If I’d had my laptop, I could have just typed you a
letter, but I don’t like to write,” she declared.
I was
surprised and a little sad. I have wonderful childhood memories of corresponding
with my pen pal, Lori, who lived in Hawaii, and writing letters to my parents
when I was at summer camp was a fun experience. I always added a P.S. at the
end of every note, and I loved sealing the envelope and adding a stamp. Are
those days really gone?
Unfortunately,
they may be. The new Common Core Standards require legible handwriting in
Kindergarten and grade 1, but they do not include cursive handwriting. However, the standards do state that by the
end of Fourth Grade, students must demonstrate the keyboarding skills
necessary to complete a one-page writing assignment.
As an OT, I
am very much “pro-cursive.” Why? Writing in cursive has a number of benefits.
·
Writing
in cursive develops visual motor and manipulative skills, which are important
for daily living skills, recreation, and work.
·
Research
suggests that students who write in cursive efficiently have better academic
skills, including reading comprehension.
·
One
must be able to read cursive handwriting in order to read historical documents
written in cursive.
·
Research
reveals that students who write in cursive receive better grades than those who
print.
·
Requiring
keyboarding at young ages can be a detriment because if the child’s hands are
too small for the keyboard, they will develop a habit of “hunting and pecking,”
which can be difficult to break.
·
Too
much time in front of a computer screen can lead to eyestrain, discomfort, and
headaches.
·
A
cursive signature is important for preventing forgery and necessary when
signing legal documents.
Important
Points
·
Regular practice and reinforcement are necessary when learning print, write
in cursive, AND keyboard correctly and efficiently.
·
Just like cursive handwriting, keyboarding is an important skill. It
allows for ease in editing, guarantees legibility, and is an ideal tool for
children who have dysgraphia. Students should be skilled with handwriting skills AND keyboarding skills.
It is
my hope that school systems continue to include cursive instruction in their
curriculum, despite the fact that cursive is not included in the Common Core
Standards.
To hear more thoughts on cursive in this era of technology, check out PediaStaff's blog post with links to other articles written by occupational therapists in response to the NYT Article!
To hear more thoughts on cursive in this era of technology, check out PediaStaff's blog post with links to other articles written by occupational therapists in response to the NYT Article!
Photo Credit: Microsoft Office
As a handwriting specialist, and not an OT, I question several aspects of the method commonly known as “cursive;” there have been many diverse cursives since our Roman alphabet came into existence.
ReplyDeleteI question superior speed. I am familiar with the writings of Steve Graham, and have not known of his endorsement of cursive for its speed.
The research to which you refer does not specify “cursive.” Significant research has been done, but the method of writing was not the issue. In fact, much of it has been with young children using some form of print-script.
My item #2 relates to your statement that students get better grades with cursive than with print.
4) Well, no, my signature is just fine. It is my variation of italic.
Decent arguments/points up until the stovepipe hats...that's a very poor analogy.
ReplyDelete